Do you know of AI Agents in Testing? If yes, which ones have you: Tried? Heard Of? Seen demos? Here are the ones that I have seen / tried: M365 Agents (Created using Copilot Studio) Github Copilot (Agent Mode) Testsigma Agents Kusho AI Test Generator Agent What else?

We’re looking into Atlassian’s agent - Rovo. The UI is pretty good for setting context and when prompted will analyse confluence pages as well with pretty good results. I’ve used it in this to generate regression test cases for user stories.

Interesting.. I think it looks like a Workflow Agent. Workflow agents enhance existing workflows, and Humans stay in control

Mabl and Testomat.io …Also there are different types of AI agent like Simple Reflex, Model Based , goal based , Learning based , Utility Based agent …problem with any agent i have seen so far is that these agents dont understand ur product they only understand patterns like

I tried Github copilot codeRabbit Codex I’m only using claude code now with gittree structure and parallel subagents and it works like a charm Also I tried, build and use Wizzo :grin:

From what I can see it is designed to be used with triggers in JIRA/Confluence. At the moment it is ‘manually’ triggered to generate test ideas. More importantly, I’ve built an agent to do a quality check on new user stories against related items and existing documentation. It looks for gaps and in…

Automation: I’ve had a look at the playwright ones, planner, generator and healer. These are web app dynamic behavior based. It’s debatable whether planning and generating should be done based on behavior rather than using an agent that generates these direct from code. Healer has a “try to please” …

Interesting! For now, it looks like a workflow agent. Based on how you want it, you seem to be going to make it as a “Semi-Autonomous Agent”.

[image] andrewkelly2555: “try to please” bias I think this is the “Placation” syndrome. Read more here: Large Language Model Syndromes – DevelopSense [image] andrewkelly2555: Agents generating test cases for manual execution I think is absurd Even I am currently ignoring (avoiding) t…

I agree: Even I am currently ignoring (avoiding) these for many reasons… the top being focus on “quality” over “quantity”. Though the company I work at seems to be going down this path. But from what l have seen so far the agents does a copy paste and converts it into a test case with a bit of extr…

AI Agents in Testing - Let's list the ones you have tried

Discussions

hananurrehman (Hanan Ur Rehman) 13 November 2025 23:38 2

Playwright introduced some test agents too but in my experience if you ditch playwright’s agents and copilot too, Cursor in itself performs better. Cursor also has a built in planner mode.

Topic		Replies	Views
Have you built any GPT Agents for testing? If so, could you share in comments or recommend any? Discussions chatgpt , llms , testing , ai-agents	13	345	13 February 2026
OpenAI and what it says about testing with agents Discussions ai , agentic-ai , openai , ai-testing , agentic-testing	1	95	1 December 2025
Has anyone tried out the new Agents of Playwright — the Planner, Generator, and Healer? Discussions tools , learning , automation , ai , ai-agents	2	424	10 October 2025
What do you think about AI features for software testers? Discussions tools , ai	19	1194	11 December 2023
AI assisted exploratory testing, how are you doing it? Discussions exploratory-testing , ai	6	409	22 February 2026

AI Agents in Testing - Let's list the ones you have tried

Related topics