Discover the impact of the Quality Assistance Model in our latest article, “Better Software, Faster: A Tester’s Report On The Quality Assistance Model.” written by @nat. This article explores how a tech company revolutionised its testing approach, shifting from traditional quality assurance to a model where every team member contributes to software quality and testing.
Learn how this change not only accelerated software delivery but also significantly improved product quality without the need for additional testers. Ideal for anyone looking to enhance team efficiency, this article is a valuable resource for understanding how to implement such a model effectively.
Check out the article for insights and practical examples, and share your thoughts with us!
Honestly I have a hard time reading further after reading the part about this model originating with Atlassian–as a heavy user of their products I think I’m far from the only one to take issues with their product quality so I don’t have much respect for their expertise on that topic.
(I’ll try to post a more productive reply in a couple days when I have a window to read the rest of the article, but I do feel like we need to do more vetting of the outcomes of those in our industry advocating for reducing or removing the dedicated tester role. If you’re promoting a model but your quality stinks, maybe we shouldn’t take your model very seriously. Also, this is nothing against the blog author, simply an observation seeing Atlassian mentioned as the origin of a model.)