πŸ€– Day 6: Explore and share insights on AI testing tools

Focusing on test case generation, I tried to look for some AI MindMap tools to help assist in brainstorming test cases and testing aspects, for manual exploratory testing or functional testing.

Here are a few that I have tried, by giving the same prompt with 2 points of acceptance criteria, and ask them to design the test cases and draw a mindmap.

  1. Chatmind: https://chatmind.tech/
    It focus more on listing out cases for the numberic factors in my example, breaking down the cases in different values for fields like date, points, birthday. It is useful in reviewing if our test data has enough coverage.
    Context: β˜…β˜…β˜…
    User Experience: β˜…β˜…β˜…

  2. MyMap: https://www.mymap.ai/
    It provides more diversed and general aspects of testing, which has a higher overall coverage but less into the details or test data, such as suggestions on audit logging which my example originally did not mention as a criteria. It would be useful for brainstorming a higher-level test plan.
    Context: β˜…β˜…β˜…
    User Experience: β˜…β˜…β˜…

  3. GitMind: https://gitmind.com/
    Generates traditional functional test cases, list out postitive, negative, edge cases, performance test cases. Good level of details and comprehensive.
    Context: β˜…β˜…β˜…
    User Experience: β˜…β˜…β˜…

  4. Wondershare EdrawMind: https://www.edrawmind.com/
    Generates traditional functional test cases but less amount, list out only the main test cases for the criteria. Not as useful for brainstorming, but could be useful if one only wants a short list of acceptance test cases.
    Context: β˜…β˜…β˜†
    User Experience: β˜…β˜…β˜†

  5. Whimsical: https://whimsical.com/
    This one feels like a breakdown of the given lines into keywords and it takes them as factors to test. e.g. My given line has keywords like admin, points, reward, birthdate, and it add one node for each of these β€œfactors” on the mindmap, describing a one-line test case to verify the corresponding validity.
    Context: β˜…β˜†β˜†
    User Experience: β˜…β˜…β˜†

  6. Taskade: https://www.taskade.com/
    The UI looks fancy but the UX is not very clear and I failed to create a mindmap. Yet it gives me a list of test cases, which is similar to other GPT test cases.
    Context: β˜…β˜†β˜†
    User Experience: β˜†β˜†β˜†

  7. Jeda: https://www.jeda.ai/
    It generates a memo-style visual which looks good in presentation, but not very useful for professional testing, as it is like listing a few examples for the criteria instead of test cases.
    Context: β˜†β˜†β˜†
    User Experience: β˜…β˜…β˜†

It is just a brief trial so please just take the stars as my first impressions only. Also the test above only looks into the performance of the direct result, pricing and other factors like mindmap editing, team collaboration are not reviewed.

8 Likes