Hi there!
So we are going to have an evening session that we call “exploration night” where we explore tools, concepts, methodologies and such. This time we wanted to shake things up and instead of exploring tools, we wanted to have a “debate” on Low/No-Code automation frameworks VS Full Programming Frameworks.
The concept is: There is a team Pro Low/No-Code and a Team Pro Full Programming. They have to “defend” their point of view. You do not know on what team you’ll be + we’ll be switching teams, so you are defending it even through you might not like it at some point… ! Just to step out of your comfort zone a bit.
The idea is that we’ll provide some questions before hand to ask and people can ask sub-questions during the debate yourself. People have to prepare for answers both sides.
What questions would you ask to challenge them why one side might be better then the other one?
Think about: skills required, CI/CD, team effort, learning curve, upskilling, cost … literally any aspect can be touched! 