A recent discussion here got me thinking — for a lot of us the painful part isn’t the testing, it’s writing it all up afterwards and keeping the evidence straight.
So I sketched a concept: you test like normal, and it records your steps, screenshots, console and network in the background — then writes up what you actually did (it doesn’t invent tests or bugs).
How it’d work across a release:
→ Pick the ticket you’re verifying, hit Start capture, and test as normal.
→ Hit a bug? It drafts a bug report with the steps and evidence already attached, linked back to that ticket. You review and edit, then push it to the tracker.
→ Ticket passes? It logs a clean session as proof it was verified — what you checked, with evidence.
Nothing re-typed into Jira or your test tool, and everything traces back to the ticket.
Early, clickable prototype (sample data) — Radar 
Genuinely after honest feedback: would this save you real time, or is it solving a problem you don’t have? And would you trust an auto-drafted report enough to actually send it?