How to identify the good QA CV and applicants

Any one have the idea about the short list the good QA CV and identify the QA applicants.

This can be automate or manual testing . Can i get the tips for this activity.

4 Likes

What I like most about resumes is LONG resumes. People often think a 1 page resume is the thing to do. But I totally disagree. I very much like a longer resume even if it’s 20 pages.

What I look for in a resume is peoples skills, methodologies and technology that they’ve used in a project as well as a small summary of the project itself and what the company is about. I want to see peoples challenges and realizations in their resumes. When I read the resume, I want to feel how proud they are of their work experience there.

A nice addon would be to see their goals/ambitions in their resume. Normally I always ask this in interviews BUT if they have it on their resume, for me, it only makes it more clear of what the person wants and it shows ambition and that they’ve thought about it.

4 Likes

This is the different perspective now days single page CVs most of people using

1 Like

Yea for sure! I work as a consultant for a company and I often do smaller projects also. If I have to list them all on 1 page with all my skills and technologies used… : / It’s going to be written in Font Size 5 :joy:

1 Like

I don’t think we can answer this question without more context. You’re asking for a short list of ‘good QA CV’ - we would need to know the role being applied for to comment.

As for CV’s generally, in my opinion a CV is just merely a ‘declaration’ of where you’ve been and what you’ve done. It should be brief, and only contain stuff that you believe to be relevant to the job you’re applying for. It should be enough to get you through the ‘filter’ of other job applicants, and you should be prepared to talk about anything on that CV.

A good CV should be accompanied by a cover note.

Anyone can put anything on a CV, but the cover note is where you bring it all to life. Your cover note is what you should use to explain how you’ve worked, what interesting or challenging projects you’ve been on. What inspiring people you worked with and what practical skills you learned on the way. You should be prepared to be able to talk about - at length - what’s on your cover note and it should of course again be geared towards the job your applying for.

2 Likes

I disagree with this to be honest, if a person has done X or Y on a project, it’s good to shine because a company might say we need A or B but in fact they could really use X or Y but they just don’t know about it :smiley:

It’s nice to see peoples skills imho

3 Likes

Regarding A good cover note i will agree with this some times we will get 50 CVs per day so filtering the CV based on cover note

1 Like

Tips for a good CV

  • it is concise (1 or 2 pages at most)
  • it includes only up-to-date info about technologies and skills. Not that tool that the candidate used 10 years ago for a few times
  • each job description has a clear definition of what candidates have actually done at the job, not what were his or her daily tasks. Done here - means that there are achievements with more or less clear measurements
  • if candidate has it - a link to Github or Youtube with the recording of talks
2 Likes

Some skills are not always appropriate to list on a CV when you’re applying for a job… it really depends on how you want to present yourself to that place.

What I didn’t say is that your CV should also have links to any professional sites you’re on - such as Linkedin, or your own website / blog or even your git profile… and this is where you showcase ALL your skills.

3 Likes

From the company’s point of view they should have thought ahead of time what skills and behaviours are important for the role. Then this info is summarised in the job advert (in the form of a job spec and/or person spec).

So a good CV is one that makes it easy for the reader to see that you’re a good match for the required skills and behaviours. Just matching them isn’t enough - you need to make it easy for the reader to see this.

There’s a bit of an art to this - just throwing more words at the problem might backfire, because the reader might give up before getting to the good stuff. What do you think is most important to the reader? Make the words for that really easy to read - towards the top of the CV, etc.

Some things might be just a matter of “I know X”, but much of the time you’ll need to provide evidence. So, not just “I can test” or “I worked as a tester on team X for this date range” but “I was a tester on the data integration team. I advised developers on how to improve their automated testing, which brought test run times down from 45 minutes to 14 minutes with no loss of quality. Through conversations with product owners I found potentially costly bugs before implementation…”

This is sometimes expressed as what → so what? The “what” is a bit of information; the “so what?” is why it’s important. What = “I worked as a tester on team X for this date range”. Why is this important? Because I helped the developers, found bugs etc.

If you point to things outside your CV / job history that help then do so. Other people have mentioned this - things like a GitHub repo, blog etc. Also any hobbies or volunteering etc. you do - if they provide evidence of things that are valuable to the role, then include them and make it clear how they are relevant.

Because of all this ^^^ a good CV is often customised for each application. As a job applicant it can help to have a document that has a library of all the bits you could include in a CV, and you pull from that for each job application.

2 Likes

I will vehemently (but respectfully) disagree. I’ve personally never seen a resume longer than 2-3 pages that wasn’t chock full of unhelpful “filler” and repetition.

That’s totally fine, I think it differs from country to country also. Here in Belgium there are many test/qa consultants who do 3-6-9-12months projects with different clients (sometimes multiple at the same time), so it’s all we see here.

It’s defo not a filler since it’s just a listing of peoples experience.

I’ve looked at hundreds of CV’s in the last few years, and for me, too many words or pages are noise. I like facts based, bullet pointed lists of the roles you’ve had for how long, with what technologies, team structures and responsibilities. And honestly, I don’t like tailored CV’s, send me your LinkedIn. I want to know the whole person, not the person you think I want to see. A cover note is fine, but not necessary.
But, my hiring process makes this all very easy. Candidates take an online ability test as step one, if they pass I take a look at the CV to make sure the basics are there and have a 30 min unstructured phone chat with the person. The CV is a useful conversation starter for the individual to tell me about their roles.

So really, I think that as a hiring manager, you have to decide what is a good CV for you. My perfect CV is going to be very different @kristof’s, but that’s fine. Life would be dull if we were all the same :slight_smile:

Probably easier to identify a list of red flags with a CV starting with Comic Sans… :stuck_out_tongue:

2 Likes

Same! My resume is what it is. I’m not gonna put key words from the job app into my resume either.
My LinkedIn profile is pretty bland though. So resume it is :smiley:

Yea totally fine, I do believe it depends from person to person and company to company and country to country.

I’m a consultant and if you are hiring a consultant with only 1 or 2 projects. It doesn’t stand out to me, more as in “he doesn’t have much experience in different environments”.

But as you said, totally fine and context dependent! :slight_smile:

Amen :smiley:

1 Like

I wrote about this in Hiring a Software Tester, an Analysis and will be doing another publication on the subject soon.

The short answer is it depends. The only way for you @kayu to understand good CVs and applicants is for you to try it yourself, learn and optimize. It will very much depend on your context and who / what you are hiring for.

In the article I published, I work in a startup environment with mostly modern testing practices. We were product based, not project based. I also got a lot of applicants. Given those constraints, I need resumes that are easy to understand. That means long resumes are too confusing and don’t make it to the interview stage.

Some people must like long resumes, I see them a lot with contractors and/or people working for contracting companies. To me that’s all fluff and doesn’t tell a good testing story about what you’ve done.

1 Like

I like it when people offer links to their other works: LinkedIn, GitHub, blog, etc. That provides a much more complete or well rounded view of who they are. I’ll take the time to glance at those things in addition to the resume.

I actually given candidates an initial / step one “screen email” with some questions. What is the ability test you give them them?

Yes give analyses give more inside i think it depend on our requirement we have to shortlist the CVs

things like a GitHub repo, blog etc. Also any hobbies or volunteering etc. you do - if they provide evidence of things that are valuable to the role,

This would be valuable screening mechanism , We are using on this

I thought we’d got away from the covering letters, especially with applications using websites and linkedIn more and more. The tailored CV doing some of the work the letter would have done.

3 Likes

Some job postings may not require them. It also might be different if you’re working with a recruiter for your next role, as they will be able to convey your personality and motivations…

…but otherwise just a CV on its own, does not tell your story like a targeted cover note can - hiring decision makers don’t have time to trawl through professional social media sites for candidates - they want to know why you’re applying and what makes you tick.

1 Like