In the early days of my testing career Iโd jump straight into scenarios โ โI need to test this and test thatโ. I noticed a profound difference in my approach to testing once I tried my best to capture risks first. My senses open to more opportunities and typically discovering more useful things.
Do you R&Q? (Risks and Questions):
- Write down risks i.e. stuff that would suck โ written as a statement e.g. An admin user is unable to download the weekly report
- Write down questions related to those risks e.g. What happens when an admin user attempts to download the weekly report?
- Go explore and answer those questions related to risk
- Document discoveries and share
- Agree actions, go back to 1.
This 5-point R&Q approach attempts to summarise something that encourages teams to focus on risk first. I enjoy how itโs possible to map a risk statement with a series of (hopefully) answered questions.
What do you think? How would you describe your approach to the relationship between risks, questions, exploration and sharing?