Attending LambdaTest’s TestMu Conference this week, I just wondered what anyone else thought of the unveiling of their new AI powered product, KaneAI?
Gut reaction thoughts please?
3 Likes
I still have massive concerns regarding the outputs from “AI”.
Practically all the “AI” systems I have used and seen have produced inaccurate outputs.
4 Likes
Hi, thanks for the news.
First, let’s forget about “AI” and use “Generative AI” instead. It is not the same thing.
Then, as waddwes88 suggested, GenAI results have not got the minimum quality to be trusted, so why should I let a “AI agent” do some work that I will need to verify? I feel like it is adding more workload to my plate.
3 Likes
True, need to be careful with GenAI, all need to be checked after.
And It’s really interesting question, will it help to decrease time or will it more complexity to the process?!
1 Like
I find it interesting, with proper training it might be decent!
I very much like the part of where if you update the codebase, it will schedule an existing test case for the testers already. (this doesn’t mean you still need to manually verify other cases)
This could be very interesting! 
1 Like