Which tools have you guys used and how effectively you used mind map to present your ideas.
Xmind. Never found something I like better, although I haven’t researched the tools in a few years now. For me a mindmapping tool has to be very carefully linked to its controls - the shortcuts must be good and make sense, because I’m not stopping to click “add” or whatever. A mindmap is just a squashed bullet point list, and I want it as easy to make a mindmap as a list.
I’m interested how effectively you guys made use of the mind maps you created…
- Like using them to project your QA process flow to the team ?
- Made it collaborative by getting feedbacks from the devs?
- Any interesting responses you received from your team ?
I don’t really know what a QA process flow is. I looked it up, and found one article on QA process flow that didn’t define QA process flow. So I went back to the words, and, to me, QA = testing, process = series of actions to achieve a goal, flow = moving in a continuous stream. That’s a problem for me because I find that testing doesn’t flow in one direction and the actions I need to take are unpredictable and testing is inherently unbounded.
When I work with teams I tend to use whatever they want to use. So if I’m working with stories on a kanban board then we adapt that, perhaps add a test column (at least initially), and from there I work my magic. I find that I give people what they need to know in my reporting, and what I choose to do depends on each product, area, story and so on. I do whatever it takes, then inform people in the best way I can. So I have some guides on how I do things, but it’s mostly informed by existing process and context. I like this flexibility and power. So it’s hard to mindmap - but I might be entirely wrong at what you’re getting at, I’m making assumptions.
I do use mindmaps for some things; I like them for mapping something when doing recon sessions because the detail I have to include shows me which branches have a lot of functionality, and I can keep track of how important each one is, so I get a good idea of complexity and risk factors as I go, and can better decide on how to use my resources as I build my strategy. I can also take it to others to ask questions about how things are structured. Because mind maps don’t tend to support loops, like graphs, I can find out if there are any loops in the flow of the program.
I also like them for reference, broken up by area, for things that rarely change like some risk catalogues or process checklists, or other mnemonics like the HTSM if I’m going to take a printout to work with on a design meeting or something.