@rightsaidjames via @gemma.hill1987 shared an absolute beauty of a bug!
What bugs have you discovered or heard about that just make you smile?
Feel free to add them to this thread.
@rightsaidjames via @gemma.hill1987 shared an absolute beauty of a bug!
What bugs have you discovered or heard about that just make you smile?
Feel free to add them to this thread.
Last year here in Belgium we saw this:

It translates to âHigh Prices, Low Qualityâ
â Small mistake from the marketing team ![]()
even i could understand that one, ouch!
mixed languages

There are 3 different languages in this screenshot. âVersandinformationenâ, âBearbeitungâ,âLieferadresseâ and âRechnungsadresseâ are German, but âStandaard 2-3 werkdagenâ is Dutch.
I once found a bug where the delete button disappeared after deleting an item.
Oh yeah. ![]()
I also thought, well maybe thatâs the Unix epoch but thatâs 1970. So maybe there was another thing called âCOVID-19â back in 1965 and we just missed that one. ![]()
My all time favourite has been a confirmation message to a process that would move data from one system to another. The theory was that it would go through the âare you sure, are you really sureâ style of questioning as there was no return other than a system restore and the first confirmation message gave a standard âClick Yes to continueâ with Yes and No options, the second was along the lines of âContinuing will transfer your data. There is no reversal option. Are you sure you wish to continue?â with just a âYesâ button. No going back!
Same dev used a weird method to generate an identification code for records - the code was supposed to use the first x characters of the name plus y digits on record creation with digits incrementing within the char values e.g. ABC001, ABC002 etc. Turned out that the dev hit the record twice - created it by inserting the record hardcoded with a specific value for the code (e.g. ABC777), then they updated the record to give the correct code. Worked fine for a few years until a customer hit the point where they already had a record with ABC777! Not something that could be picked up by a tester, but something that a code review should have spotted.
My guess is that they copied the error message from a date of birth field and failed to consider if it was really suitable for this context!